Sujet : Re: S paceTime
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physicsDate : 15. Feb 2025, 18:59:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <voqklo$95om$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/15/25 2:12 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
>
Richard Hachel wrote:
>
Le 14/02/2025 à 07:05, Physfitfreak a écrit :
On 2/13/25 11:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>
Do I make myself clear?
>
Not really.
>
What must be understood is that the theory of relativity is basically
true, but so misunderstood and poorly taught that it all becomes
appalling.
This poses two problems; one which is benign, and which is the writing of
a whole new theory to be rewritten, or rather to be corrected.
A theory capable of explaining things with extraordinary simplicity.
Someone who has read Doctor Richard Hachel, helped by artificial
intelligence can easily, very easily do it.
The other is immense, colossal, and goes beyond the scientific framework
to enter the psychological or even theological framework.
"Certainly, it is magnificent, no one has understood RR better than him,
and no one has taught it as clearly as he. But we do not want this man to
reign over us".
>
The die is cast.
>
R.H.
>
"basically true"???? Which part ISN'T mostly True?
In other words, What isn't true?
Depends on what you mean when you say, "true."
Re: S paceTime
Re: S paceTime