Re: The CMBR Disproves the Big Bang.

On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:29:30 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 2/21/2025 3:28 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:35:47 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>

On 2/21/2025 11:39 AM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

The velocity-distance relation requires the furthest galaxies to recede
the fastest, making this Big Bang universe anisotropic.
>
The CMBR is isotropic.
>
Therefore, the CMBR disproves the Big Bang.

>
For fun, think if the "big bang" was nothing more than a very large
local explosion? Two super massive black holes finally merging into one,
kaaabooom! could be a candidate, perhaps?

If the universe is spherical the surface has no center so we cannot be
on it. We have to be in the center of that sphere because the red-shift
is exactly the same in every direction.

>
What about the great attractor?

According to the Big Bang velocity-distance relation it is the same so
there would be a sprinkling of great attractors. If there is not, then
that contradicts the Big Bang Baloney. "From 1989 until 1993, COBE
satellite Explorer 66 investigated the cosmic microwave background [18].
Astrophysicists expected to see evidence of directional dependency
(anisotropy) that could be
traced back to the site of the alleged big bang. That was not what they
saw, however. Instead, Explorer 66 measured an isotropic blackbody
spectrum with little variation across the sky." - "Something is
Seriously Wrong with Cosmology" - David Rowland.