Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on m=E/c^2

W dniu 04.03.2025 o 22:05, J. J. Lodder pisze:

rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
[AI stupidities]

MY FINAL COMMENT: I'm an electronic engineer with vast practical
experience, in particular in the field of instruments.

 So you are incompetent as an 'electronic engineer' as well.
 

As an analogy to my doubt about E=mc^2, I bring this case: How was defined
what 1 Ohm was, around 1900? By consensus, being UK instrumental in such
adopted definition.

 Of course, all units are always defined by consensus
of the people who use them. How else could it be?

As it was with your ISO wannabe second:
some brainwashed morons are announcing
a complete idiocy for ideological
reasons - and then it is pissed at by
all people who measure for real, not for
gedanken.