Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on m=E/c^2

Am Dienstag000004, 04.03.2025 um 18:24 schrieb rhertz:

On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:35:41 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 <snip>

It is much correct in what you say.
>
BUT:
The equation
   E = ∝ m
say there is some kind of equivalence between mass and energy,
and that mass can be converted to energy and vice versa.
>
This can only be empirically tested.

 <snip>
 

E = m
>
But remember, the equivalency is empirically shown to be true.

 It's a no-brainer to believe in the conversion of mass into energy.

Sure, because it doesn't make sense.
The error is, that meant with 'm' is not 'mass', but 'amount of matter'.
Mass is a physical quantity and a measure for resistance to acceleration and not for 'amount of matter'.
But one quantity cannot morph into another quantity, because that would be against the rules for physical quantities.
Matter, however, can 'transmute' into a state, for which we have no mass, but energy.
But the would say:
MATTER (!!!!) can be converted into massless radiation (NOT mass)!!

 In the last couple of millenniums, or even longer than that, and even
before the CONSENSUS that heat was a kind of energy (early XIX century),
thousands/millions of inquisitive minds wondered HOW COME wood in a fire
CONSUMED to ashes, with most of its volume disappearing, while heat
(radiant, by convection or conduction) was generated. The first
water-based engine/toy was invented about 2,000 years ago.
 The heated water disappeared (mass), converting the opposite flows into
mechanical work (energy). Ancient Romans enjoyed this gadget, and I'm
sure that many tried to find a practical use of this effect.

'mass' is NOT meant as 'amount of matter'!

https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/oqn2f/ til_the_ancient_romans_had_steam_engines_the/
 What I've been questioned here, for years, is that E=mc^2 is A FUCKING
CONVENTION, and that Einstein committed FRAUD in his FUCKING 1905 paper,
using circular reasoning. After a few years, seal physicists applauded
this simple equation (NOT PROVEN ONCE THEORETICALLY), and hyped the
image of Einstein as the genius of geniuses.
  Relativity is MORE A CULT than anything else. It's a pseudoscience that
the Jewish community has been shoving down the throat of gullible, yet
intelligent people.

'relativity' is actually a really simple principle, which nobody would reject.
Another story would be, whether or not Einstein's paper 'On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies' makes sense.
I would say:
Einstein's paper is FULL of errors of all kinds and an affrond to any scientific reader.
My guess: It was meant as an insult and was maintained by power in an unscientific realm, because people in the 'community' had to swallow that piece of garbage, unless they wanted to be expelled from job and the academic community.
That hateful behaviour, hostile to that 'community', was actually Einstein's behaviour while in Princton:
he gave (almost) no lectures
his writing desk and his office were a mess
he found nothing
he wore no socks
he had nothing you would call 'haircut'
his wife looked like a male in a dress
he stretched out his tounge, when being photographed
...
TH