Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on m=E/c^2

rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 21:05:37 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
 
<snip>
 

Of course, all units are always defined by consensus
of the people who use them. How else could it be?
And FYI, the Ohm is not a fundamental unit, it has never been,
and there has never been a primary standard for it,
only secondary ones.
(the SI is a kg, meter second, Amp system, remember?)

 
<snip>
 
Imbecile Jan, consensus my ass.

Ass indeed.
You are neither a scientist, nor an engineer.

Real scientists and engineers know that nothing of relevance
can be done without consensus on units and measurements.

Jan

For amusement of others: The good ship VASA, Stockholm harbour,
is a nice example of an effect of lack of consensus in units.
(if is not just NASA that was blundering with units)

Half the ship was built by Swedish shipwrights, who used feet with 12
inches to the foot. The other half by imported Amsterdam shipwrights
who used a different foot with 11 inches to the foot.
Their calibrated rulers have been found.
We know what happened to the ship...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_(ship)>