Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on m=E/c^2

Am Freitag000007, 07.03.2025 um 10:35 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:

Den 06.03.2025 17:18, skrev rhertz:

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 8:38:47 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>

Den 05.03.2025 19:11, skrev rhertz:

>
I question your assertion that E = mc² work both ways (mc² = E). This IS
NOT AN EQUATION! This is a 1-way expression, which doesn't work
reversing terms positions.

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production
>
γ → e⁻ + e⁺

 

>
I asked you not to come with the particle physics shit.

 But I did it anyway!
 So you better use your lethal argument:
 Richard Hertz knows that all the physicists who are working
with the particle physics shit are members of a MAFFIA, and
profit from it. This is because he believes the different
results are COOKED with the help of statistical manipulations,
fraud, cooking and peer complicity.

I would go THAT far.
But 'materialism' is maintained and supported by a huge number of people.
Einstein, for instance, was extremely materialistic, also Marx was.
But the so called 'Great materialistic meta paradigm' is one big fat lie!
It is so well established, that people do not even dare to rethink that concept and simply believe, what a HUGE propaganda machine has hammered into their brain.
But that concept is wrong, nevertheless, as we can see - for instance- in 'pair production', in 'Growing Earth', 'abiogenic oil' (and also in '9/11').
Because 'pair production' has no obvious political or economic implications, I would take that as example and try to explain, why already this violated the 'materialistic paradigm'.
The idea behind materialism is a dichotomy between 'stuff' (aka 'matter') and 'empty space', while the other concept does not distinguish between space and matter and makes matter 'relative'.
Now creation of a pair of particles is already a case of conversion from energy to mass, because 'mass' is a scalar quantity and has no direction and no negative values.
Therefore, both particles have a scalar positive mass, which would add to a non-zero positive sum of two masses, while the rays from which they were created had non (only energy).
That's why we have now particles with mass, while rays with energy disappeared.
The opposite is also possible and the particle and antiparticle could annihilate to some kind of rays.
This says, that matter is not really material stuff, but kind of special state of rays, hence matter is not 'materialistic', which would violate the 'great materialistic metaparadigm'.
And that in turn would make a few important concepts of physics obsolete (and had political and economical implications).
And because it cannot be what should not be, physicist had to swallow and create nonsense (only).
TH