Re: The insanity of the pseudoscience SR by 1905

On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:09:54 +0000, Python wrote:

Le 23/03/2025 à 02:14, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :

[snip nonsense]

>

HOW COME, IF TIME IS PERCEIVED AS DILATED from calculations of the
observer at rest, and length is perceived as contracted in the same
stupid remote perception,
THE INERTIAL MOTION WITH SPEED v IS PERCEIVED AS CERTAIN?

>
Why don't you check by yourself ? Using Lorentz Transformations
equations
it is quite easy to compute dx'/dt'.

You fail to understand that:
dv/dt = dv/dt' = 0
is A FUCKING POSTULATE, so this is strongly embedded into posterior
calculations.
It has the same level as this part of the second postulate in the 1905
paper:
dc/dt = dc/dt' = 0
You have to reason critically BEYOND MATHEMATICS, about the consequences
of these two postulates.
But maybe what I ask is too much for you.
Your proposal to compute dx'/dt' has no sense, because they are
equations created AFTER the postulates were used.