Re: The proof of inconsistency of Einstein's Shit, - a bit differently

Le 23/03/2025 à 06:40, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

So, let's "gedanke" an observer Bob
crossing solar state with the speed
of c/2. Bob is going to measure
the length of a solar day.
 Now - is "Bob's result will be
about 99766s" a valid consequence
of your SR shit?
 Yes or no?

It's much more complicated than you think, because you're starting from the principle of chronotropy dilation as a function of speed, but while that's sufficient for physicists, it's not for Hachel, who claims that position is crucial. Where is the rocket as it crosses the solar system? Is it fleeing the Earth? Is it orbiting the Sun?
I repeat, there is a dilation of CHRONOTROPY (not to be confused with measured time) in time as a function of speed. But there is also a direct temporal Doppler effect to take into account.
We arrive at the equation t'=t.(1+cosµ.v/c)/sqrt(1-v²/c²).
And so I can't give you an answer if I don't have the rocket's displacement angle.
R.H.