Sujet : Re: The insanity of the pseudoscience SR by 1905
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 23. Mar 2025, 16:22:25
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <xVCdndNZ0M-tun36nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 03/23/2025 07:09 AM, Python wrote:
Le 23/03/2025 à 02:14, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :
[snip nonsense]
>
HOW COME, IF TIME IS PERCEIVED AS DILATED from calculations of the
observer at rest, and length is perceived as contracted in the same
stupid remote perception,
THE INERTIAL MOTION WITH SPEED v IS PERCEIVED AS CERTAIN?
>
Why don't you check by yourself ? Using Lorentz Transformations
equations it is quite easy to compute dx'/dt'.
Rather it's trivial to arrive at an expression thereof,
yet of course implicits in algebraic quantities lead out
of the various derivations.
There are a bunch of ways to result something "Lorentz invariant".
Then that's usually considered the minimal needful to say "models SR".