Re: The insanity of the pseudoscience SR by 1905

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: The insanity of the pseudoscience SR by 1905
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 23. Mar 2025, 16:22:25
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <xVCdndNZ0M-tun36nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 03/23/2025 07:09 AM, Python wrote:
Le 23/03/2025 à 02:14, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :
[snip nonsense]
>
HOW COME, IF TIME IS PERCEIVED AS DILATED from calculations of the
observer at rest, and length is perceived as contracted in the same
stupid remote perception,
THE INERTIAL MOTION WITH SPEED v IS PERCEIVED AS CERTAIN?
>
Why don't you check by yourself ? Using Lorentz Transformations
equations it is quite easy to compute dx'/dt'.
Rather it's trivial to arrive at an expression thereof,
yet of course implicits in algebraic quantities lead out
of the various derivations.
There are a bunch of ways to result something "Lorentz invariant".
Then that's usually considered the minimal needful to say "models SR".

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Mar 25 * The insanity of the pseudoscience SR by 19056rhertz
23 Mar 25 +- Re: The insanity of the pseudoscience SR by 19051Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25 `* Re: The insanity of the pseudoscience SR by 19054Python
23 Mar 25  +- Re: The insanity of the pseudoscience SR by 19051Richard Hachel
23 Mar 25  +- Re: The insanity of the pseudoscience SR by 19051rhertz
23 Mar 25  `- Re: The insanity of the pseudoscience SR by 19051Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal