Re: Modern cosmology's crises

On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:16:09 +0000, Johnny LaRue wrote:

In article <vrp5l6$2gbis$4@dont-email.me>,
 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>

Bertitaylor wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>

Problem is that while telescopes show the universe as infinite hence
eternal, the Abrahamic racist bigots who find them insist the universe
must have a beginning. Hence Big Bang and ensuing nonsenses held sacred
by the pseudo physicists.
>
Woof-woof what insight we doggies have!

>
>
https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Is_the_Universe_fini
    te_or_infinite_An_interview_with_Joseph_Silk

>
You have to understand that BertiTaylor is a kooktard.
>
He/She/It  follows a quack "physicist" named Arindam.   This fool is
writing books claiming that it is possible to move vehicles (cars,
planes, spaceships) by flinging objects at an interior wall of the
vehicle.

Yes, provided that electromagnetic forces are involved in the
acceleration. Arindam makes that very clear in his original book "To the
stars!" He wrote that book in 1999 and published it online in his adda
website in 2000. Correct. Indeed this method will be the mode for space
travel, making polluting and inefficient and really stupid rockets and
jet engines mercifully obsolete.

>
This - they claim - "violates inertia".

Correct. It also throws out the theories of thermodynamics, relativity
and quantum. So theoretically in 2000 that makes Arindam the greatest
scientist after Newton.

>
Of course, moving a vehicle this way is impossible.   This is what
"external force" means.   There is nothing you can do INSIDE a vehicle
to propel it.

But Arindam did just that. He invented a new design em rail gun which
violated inertia. Plenty of video links are there for all to see, posted
in this Ng. Thus Arindam by violating inertia proved his earlier
theories which are now hard facts only fools can ignore or ridicule

>
Try this.  Pack as many people as you can inside a car.  Have the people
in the front push on the dashboard/windshield and the people in the back
seat push against the backs of the front seats.
>
Tell us how far the car moves.

That is the first step which shows the direction of thought is correct.
One has to be careful about managing the reaction.
If the reaction is the same as in this case - you are pushing back the
car with your backsides - then there is no inertia violation.
In most mechanical systems such is the case.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor

>
Now ONE person can get out of the car and push the back of the car.
The car WILL move forward.
>
THAT is how "an external force" moves something.   ANYTHING.