Re: Albert in Relativityland

W dniu 04.04.2025 o 12:33, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

Den 03.04.2025 23:06, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 9:08:46 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

>
The measured mean lifetime of a stationary muon is 2.2 μs
The measured mean lifetime of a muon moving at 0.999668⋅c is 85.36 μs.
>
These are measured facts, not math.
>
Can you give another interpretation of the facts than "time dilation"?
>
>

 

I did not say the time dilation must be the same for the same speed.
I asked why relativity says it's different.
What is the alleged cause?
When are you going to try to understand?

 Your confused nonsense can't be understood.
 

Time dilation is not a difference in lifetime.
I never denied the measured lifetimes.
I only disagreed with your interpretation that it is time dilation.
They just live longer. But why?

 Everything you say shows that you have no idea of
what time dilation is.
 So let's take it from the beginning.
Time dilation is the phenomenon that the measured time
between two events on an objects world-line depend
on the frame of reference in which it is measured.
 In the following example there is but one muon with one life.
Let the two events on the muon's world-line be its creation and decay.
If this life is measured to last 2.2 μs in the muon's rest frame

It is not and a muon doesn't even have
a "rest frame", another branch of your moronic
religion is assuring that.
Your idiot gurus have only measured a muon's
lifetime in one frame - Earth frame. Suggesting
something else is an impudent lie, expected
of course from a brainwashed relativistic fanatic
like yourself.