Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

That implies knowing solar days exactly. Here more to undrestand
seconds. The mechanics of it.
????? ???? ????? ?? ? ?????????? ?? ???????
https://%42i%74%43hute.com/vi%44eo/lgGMsNdPNANx

 
It helps even more to understand that the particular definition of any
unit of time is completely irrelevant for any kind of physics. Physical
results cannot depend on it, by definition,

 
Can't they? By definition? By WHAT definition, poor trash?
Anyway, they absolutely do. And you're a reality denier, as expected
from a relativistic idiot.

please be careful, I can see now he is also wrong, but no reason to apply
insults. I hate insults. Time is not about definitions, since it's a
dimension, a one way dimension, hence besides it's length, due
measurements on other things, there is nothing to define on it.

I like your thinking.