Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 13. Apr 2025, 09:07:27
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <4uCcnU5A9ptN7Wb6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 04/13/2025 12:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000012, 12.04.2025 um 12:39 schrieb Bobbie Bakhvalov:
Thomas Heger wrote:
>
I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than
engineers do.
>
To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds
like a synonym for 'sex'.
...
>
since you are engineer neither. Ever heard of a blackbody in your area of
interest?..
>
Actually you are right, because I'm not an engineer by profession.
>
But I own a very nice document from the university 'TU-Berlin', which
grants the academic degree 'Dipl.-Ing.' to me.
>
Therefore I'm allowed to use 'Dipl.-Ing.' on all letters that I write. I
could also write that on my door-bell (if I wanted to, what I didn't).
>
About 'blackbody radiation' I have heard before.
>
Most of the relevant equations I could write down here, without looking
them up.
>
>
Why I think, that Einstein's title is 'mocking'?
>
Well, I conducted extensive studies on that particular paper and found,
that article is really bad and FULL of errors.
>
The number of errors is sooooo large, that they cannot be explained as
mistakes, but another explanation is required.
>
This would be im my opinion an intentional offense ('mocking'), to which
the title would be the 'cherry on the cake'.
>
>
TH
Maybe he was just suffering through a language barrier.
Einstein developed a lot. Definitely there are differences early
Einstein and later Einstein. I contrast that with myself, having a very
coherent narrative since I was very versed in all the super-classical
theories then set loose on modern mathematics and premier physics.
The later Einstein, from "Out of My Later Years", when he was talking
about a field theory and not talking about the linear and rotational, I
can't really say whether he knew about the differences thereof or not,
though, a generous reading sees that he does and will arrive at them.
Or, it's arrived at.
Really you should point at me, I'm one of the premier mathematicians and
physicists of this time.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Apr 25 * Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?31gharnagel
9 Apr 25 +- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Bertitaylor
9 Apr 25 +- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Dwaine Hajdú
10 Apr 25 +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?19gharnagel
10 Apr 25 i`* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?18Arius Babaskin Rui
11 Apr 25 i `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?17Thomas Heger
11 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?16J. J. Lodder
11 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?15Douglas Laterza
12 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?14Thomas Heger
12 Apr 25 i     +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?7Bobbie Bakhvalov
13 Apr 25 i     i`* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?6Thomas Heger
13 Apr 25 i     i +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?4Ross Finlayson
14 Apr 25 i     i i`* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?3Thomas Heger
14 Apr 25 i     i i +- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Ross Finlayson
14 Apr 25 i     i i `- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Athel Cornish-Bowden
13 Apr 25 i     i `- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Edel Baburoff
12 Apr 25 i     +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?2Corbin Yuan Xiong
12 Apr 25 i     i`- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i     +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?2Ross Finlayson
12 Apr 25 i     i`- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Ross Finlayson
12 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?2J. J. Lodder
13 Apr 25 i      `- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Thomas Heger
10 Apr 25 `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?9Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25  `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?8J. J. Lodder
10 Apr 25   +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?3Ross Finlayson
10 Apr 25   i`* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?2x
14 Apr 25   i `- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Bertitaylor
11 Apr 25   `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?4Physfitfreak
11 Apr 25    `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?3J. J. Lodder
11 Apr 25     +- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Ross Finlayson
11 Apr 25     `- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal