Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
De : me (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Athel Cornish-Bowden)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 14. Apr 2025, 08:31:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vtidkf$phv3$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-04-14 03:58:05 +0000, Thomas Heger said:

Am Sonntag000013, 13.04.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
On 04/13/2025 12:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000012, 12.04.2025 um 12:39 schrieb Bobbie Bakhvalov:
Thomas Heger wrote:
 
I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than
engineers do.
 To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds
like a synonym for 'sex'.
...
 since you are engineer neither. Ever heard of a blackbody in your area of
interest?..
 Actually you are right, because I'm not an engineer by profession.
 But I own a very nice document from the university 'TU-Berlin', which
grants the academic degree 'Dipl.-Ing.' to me.
 Therefore I'm allowed to use 'Dipl.-Ing.' on all letters that I write. I
could also write that on my door-bell (if I wanted to, what I didn't).
 About 'blackbody radiation' I have heard before.
 Most of the relevant equations I could write down here, without looking
them up.
  Why I think, that Einstein's title is 'mocking'?
 Well, I conducted extensive studies on that particular paper and found,
that article is really bad and FULL of errors.
 The number of errors is sooooo large, that they cannot be explained as
mistakes, but another explanation is required.
 This would be im my opinion an intentional offense ('mocking'), to which
the title would be the 'cherry on the cake'.
  TH
 Maybe he was just suffering through a language barrier.
 Well, Einstein was German and wrote in German, hence there was no 'language barrier'.

 
 Einstein developed a lot. Definitely there are differences early
Einstein and later Einstein. I contrast that with myself, having a very
coherent narrative since I was very versed in all the super-classical
theories then set loose on modern mathematics and premier physics.
 Sure, he developed and became a much better physicist.
 But I'm talking about a certain paper from 1905, when Einstein was 26.
Forget your sex obsession: "black body" was an established term long before 1905. Newton wrote "Do not black Bodies conceive heat more easily from Light than those of other Colours do, by reason that the Light falling on them is not reflected outwards, but enters into the Bodies, and is often reflected and refracted within them, until it be stifled and lost?"
--
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Apr 25 * Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?31gharnagel
9 Apr 25 +- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Bertitaylor
9 Apr 25 +- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Dwaine Hajdú
10 Apr 25 +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?19gharnagel
10 Apr 25 i`* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?18Arius Babaskin Rui
11 Apr 25 i `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?17Thomas Heger
11 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?16J. J. Lodder
11 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?15Douglas Laterza
12 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?14Thomas Heger
12 Apr 25 i     +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?7Bobbie Bakhvalov
13 Apr 25 i     i`* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?6Thomas Heger
13 Apr 25 i     i +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?4Ross Finlayson
14 Apr 25 i     i i`* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?3Thomas Heger
14 Apr 25 i     i i +- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Ross Finlayson
14 Apr 25 i     i i `- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Athel Cornish-Bowden
13 Apr 25 i     i `- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Edel Baburoff
12 Apr 25 i     +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?2Corbin Yuan Xiong
12 Apr 25 i     i`- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i     +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?2Ross Finlayson
12 Apr 25 i     i`- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Ross Finlayson
12 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?2J. J. Lodder
13 Apr 25 i      `- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Thomas Heger
10 Apr 25 `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?9Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25  `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?8J. J. Lodder
10 Apr 25   +* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?3Ross Finlayson
10 Apr 25   i`* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?2x
14 Apr 25   i `- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Bertitaylor
11 Apr 25   `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?4Physfitfreak
11 Apr 25    `* Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?3J. J. Lodder
11 Apr 25     +- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Ross Finlayson
11 Apr 25     `- Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?1Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal