Re: t and t'

On 4/30/2025 11:23 PM, Python wrote:

Le 30/04/2025 à 23:18, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :

On 4/30/2025 11:01 PM, Python wrote:

Le 30/04/2025 à 17:39, Richard Hachel a écrit :

Le 30/04/2025 à 17:22, Python a écrit :

Le 30/04/2025 à 17:21, Richard Hachel a écrit :

Le 30/04/2025 à 16:32, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :

On 4/30/2025 3:29 PM, Python wrote:

Le 30/04/2025 à 07:22, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :

What do these variables represent?

>
Nice to see that you admit that you don't know what you are babbling about.

>
A lie, of course, as expected from a relativistic
piece of shit in genaral and from you especially.>

Follow a physics course, you'll know then.

>
You've followed and you don't.

>
Be careful, you're replying to Python.
This poster is well known in France for his stupid and aggressive replies.
If you find that what he says isn't very coherent, don't worry. Simply respond according to current scientific data.
>
R.H.

>
https://noedge.net/e/

>
Aucun intérêt.

>
I know that you cannot even consider anything debunking your nonsense

>
>
[gna gna gna] The mumble of [A.E] was not even consistent and you've got a proof.

 You couldn't recognize a proof if it kicked you in the ass Maciej.

 Jury of some mathematic olympiads had a different
opinion