Re: Do AGI-BOTS indicate Life After Death exists?

On 05/03/2025 07:51 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 05/03/2025 01:34 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Freitag000002, 02.05.2025 um 10:38 schrieb Angus Belikovich:

Thomas Heger wrote:
>

The country called 'Deutsches Reich' (='German Empire') was founded in
1871 and that was long after the times of Luther.

>
my butt, so gearmony is a fake fictitious country like ukrane?? Now we
can
put two and two together. Amazing, I had a suspicion the gearmon
language
is khazar ukran trying to speak english. That's gearmon. Hitler was a
jew
sending his khazar jew in resort recreation camps for protection, with
chocolate, swimming pools, theater, red briks domiciles, football camps,
cinema etc. Amazing.  There are movies about and proofs.
>

>
Old-German is among the ancestors of quite a lot of languages.
>
There exists actually an author, who claims, that Inkas and Mayas spoke
a language, which was derived from old-German.
>
(don't want to comment that).
>
But many languages existed, which were off-spring of that old-German
language.
>
Now at the time of Luther there was no single well defined 'Hochdeutsch'
('high German').
>
To translate the Bible, Luther had to 'cheat' a little and had to invent
a language, which was slightly different to any German dialect of his
time.
>
His translation went into one of the first book printed with the new
Gutenberg printing press and which was widely distributed.
>
Therefore Luther 'invented' modern German (in a way) and popularized
that in the region now called Germany by his bible translation.
>
Before that, German dialects were so different to others, that e.g.
Bavarians couldn't speak to -say- people from Berlin.
>
But Germany didn't exist at the time of Luther.
>
Instead there was a huge number of tiny states, cities and kingdoms.
>
These were fused together by Bismarck in the year 1871.
>
Out came the 'German Empire'.
>
But before that year, there was no country called 'Germany',
'Deutschland'  or similar.
>
The only political entity named 'Deutsch...' was the Holy Roman Empire.
>
But that was actually the Empire of the Francs, who spoke French and had
Paris as their capital.
>
Current Germany was one of the parts, which were created after the
Frankish Empire split.
>
The eastern part of that Empire of the Francs became later 'Österreich'
('eastern Empire').
>
So, in a way, Luther belonged to the 'Germanic part', where German was
spoken (not French).
>
>
TH

>
>
This is just further irrelevance.
>
That the meso-Americans and Mediterraneans were connected
by the Atlanteans in the ante-Deluvean Bronze Age cross-Atlantic
Bronze Age trade, circa 5000-10000 BC, and that the meso-Americans
and Mediterreans share both languages and scripts and pyramids
and as from the trail from Peru as with regards to the separate
Northern population what is of the red, yellow, white, and brown
peoples of about the Noachic and Vedic variously, is a bit lost
in the mists of time yet definitely has that the meso-Americans
and Mediterraneans have a cross-Atlantic bridge not explained
by the Alaska land bridge, nor Micro-nesian island hopping.
>
The ideas of the Nubians way before the Middle Egyptians then
the downfall of culture as of the ante-Deluvean times, then
with regards to various various Japheth-ites to Ireland and
Ham-ites to the Levantine and Shem-ites to the Caucasus,
and the later Vedics on down, arriving at circa 1000-800 BC,
then into usual picaresque stories like Campbell's, then
with regards to the Aristotlean as not destroyed after Alexander
and that resulting the Hellenic during the times leading up to
the descent of Manicheanism and later after the Alexandrian
to the Roman, and not much talking about the Mongols, has that
then our canon of science follows from that, after the Roman,
much, much later the Continental and British after the Medieval,
if from the great Muslem age, crossroads of culture.
>
>
Then colonialism and imperialism, for example ignoring the
rise and fall of the Sheng and Chinese isolationism, 1200 years
ago, as where the Vedics had long ago arrived, even longer,
the industrial age and so on, the information age later,
this isn't relevant except for some context, the language
and theory of modern-day science.
>
>
So, proto-Aramaic arrived from the West, not the other way around.
>
>
There are at least three trails of Man, the Nubian, the Peruvian,
and the Vedic, from the South, West, and North resp., as of for
example the blue people of the Ainu or from the East resp.
>
>

It's kind of like Chekov in "Star Trek", "Of course you know
it was invented first by my peoples in my country", and it's
like, "Chekov, shut up, you propaganda-spawned naif. Put it back
in your pants and furthermore tell Riley to stay off the comm."