Re: Yes, the old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Yes, the old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Woźniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 03. May 2025, 21:35:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <183c1eb8d0c13572$837735$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/3/2025 9:04 PM, Anil Movsarov Dikarevsky wrote:
Maciej Woźniak wrote:
 
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
  > GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
  > so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day to last 86400 s,
  > and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
>
That's right - the clocks made for serious measurements are adjusted
(calibrated) to count seconds of 1/86400 of a mean solar day. See, poor
idiots - common sense has been warning you.
 impossible.
Yet that's what is happening. Common sense has
been warning you.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 May 25 * Re: Yes, the old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy5Anil Movsarov Dikarevsky
3 May 25 `* Re: Yes, the old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy4Maciej Woźniak
3 May 25  `* Re: Yes, the old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy3Vidal Kachanovsky
3 May 25   `* Re: Yes, the old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy2Tim Takács
4 May 25    `- Re: Yes, the old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy1Kiefer Babanoff

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal