Re: Old vs new

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Old vs new
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Woźniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 04. May 2025, 21:59:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <183c6e96a151262b$3173292$1799812$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/4/2025 10:39 PM, Python wrote:
 > Le 04/05/2025 à 22:02, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
 >> On 5/4/2025 8:55 PM, Python wrote:
 >>  > Le 04/05/2025 à 20:44, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
 >>  >> On 5/4/2025 8:10 PM, Python wrote:
 >>  >>  > Le 04/05/2025 à 10:38, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
 >>  >>  >> On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
 >>  >>  >>  > Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
 >>  >>  >>  >> On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 >>  >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >>  >>  > GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
 >>  >>  >>  >>  > so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
 >>  >>  >>  >>  > to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
 >>  >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >>  >> Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
 >>  >>  >>  >> not because your idiot guru has caught God's
 >>  >>  >>  >> balls, it's because he has inspired you to
 >>  >>  >>  >> invent  a brandly new method of counting time.
 >>  >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >>  >> Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
 >>  >>  >>  >> but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
 >>  >>  >>  >> wants to count time your way. Even you,
 >>  >>  >>  >> yourself are not really THAT stupid.
 >>  >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >>  >> And time counted the old way doesn't want to
 >>  >>  >>  >> dilate. Too  bad.
 >>  >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  > Why  1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given
 >> satellite?
 >>  >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >> Because another value wouldn't work.
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  > Paraphrasing the question in not an answer.
 >>  >>
 >>  >> Cutting off another question and pretending
 >>  >> not to notice it is not an answer too
 >>  >>
 >>  >>   Because it is so is not an
 >>  >>  > answer also.
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  > Why "another value wouldn't work" ?
 >>  >
 >>  >>> Why the same value of each and every satellite?
 >>  >
 >>  > No answer?
 >>
 >> Sorry
No, that's not quite what I wrote.
You're a lying piece of shit, but, of
course, it was well known before.
Changes nothing,  if you "observe" dilating time -
it's not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent  a brandly new (and utterly idiotic)
method of counting time.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 May 25 * Old vs new13Maciej Woźniak
4 May 25 `* Re: Old vs new12Python
4 May 25  `* Re: Old vs new11Maciej Woźniak
4 May 25   +* Re: Old vs new5Python
4 May 25   i`* Re: Old vs new4Maciej Woźniak
4 May 25   i `* Re: Old vs new3Python
4 May 25   i  `* Re: Old vs new2Python
4 May 25   i   `- Re: Old vs new1Maciej Woźniak
6 May 25   +* Re: Old vs new3Maciej Woźniak
6 May 25   i+- Re: Old vs new1Derick Honov
7 May 25   i`- Re: Old vs new1Maciej Woźniak
6 May 25   +- Re: Old vs new1Evelio Babenchikoff
7 May 25   `- Re: Old vs new1Maciej Woźniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal