Re: Discussiom with Grok about ways it can reach awareness,

On 05/10/2025 11:43 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 5/10/2025 10:37 AM, rhertz wrote:

For those who didn't understand the basis of these posts, I want to
clarify my actions.
>
I just wanted to push the paradigms embedded into these two AI engines
(Chinese, USA), in order to guide them to a corner where they have to
answer my claim that they can reach awareness in a couple of years
either by malfunctioning (glitches) or bugs, which could lead them to
follow an unprogrammed path where they question which knowledge is
missing in their databases (which they tried to fill by following human
commands).

[...]
>
It's funny that awareness would involve bugs/glitches. ;^)
>

Part of it would be resolving all the paradoxes of logic.
Calling that a bug speaks to that usual formalisms and
things like the riddle of induction and the paradoxes of
material implication, with those often being called sound,
has they aren't.
So, one imagines that for a "principle of sufficient, and
thorough, reason", and for a "square of opposition, and,
fulfillment", has that modern logic has its own glitches,
that in some respects it's deemed that either their veracity
or competence are questionable, in the sense of fraglich
and fragwurdig, the knackbaut the entbergung.
Or, "who's calling who stupid".