Re: Energy?

W dniu 03.08.2024 o 16:38, Python pisze:

Le 03/08/2024 à 16:30, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 03.08.2024 o 12:43, J. J. Lodder pisze:

...

Indeed, you may call things 'energy' in any way you want.
But back to basics: something that you call 'energy'
isn't really an energy in a physical sense
unless you can show how it can be converted
(partly, and at least in principle) to 1/2 mv^2.
>
With conservation of energy of course,

>
And, similiarly (sic), somethinf (sic) [SR]
is calling "time" - is not a time in the real sense
ubless (sic) it's  absolute/obswever (sic) independent.

 "similiarly", "somethinf", "ubless", "obswever". High on drugs today?
 Anyway, you're right in the sense that coordinate time in SR
is partly conventional (i.e. depends on clocks synchronization)
and is, at the end of day when one performs real experiments,
only an intermediate value used in calculation.
 Only colocated measurements can be done.

Take your precious measurements and put them
straight into your dumb, fanatic ass, where
they belong. With  real times, like UTimeC,
TimeAI, zone times - they have very little in
common.
And, whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).

 Maybe you will, one day, understand what SR is after all Wozniak.

Oh, some idiots worshipping that mumble
don't change the fact that it wasn't even
consistent.