Sujet : Re: Relativistic definition
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 24. Jul 2024, 04:56:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17e509f15db0839d$20493$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 23.07.2024 o 23:57, JanPB pisze:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:44:59 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
Here is a sentence from Dr. Hachel with which physicists do not agree at
all.
It's a shame.
When an individual disagrees with another individual on a scientific
theory or fact, it would be normal to ask the other party to sit down
and
explain why they are behaving in an outlandish-looking manner. , and why
it "thinks differently".
This would be a proof of logic and human coherence.
>
"If two mobiles, one in simple Galilean movement,
the other in uniformly accelerated movement with a start at rest,
cross an identical space, in identical observable times,
then their proper times will be equal."
This is false in general.
Where does the physicists' error come from?
What error?
That they followed and worshipped some inconsistent
mumble of an insane crazie, of course.