Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
De : x (at) *nospam* x.org (x)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics
Date : 30. May 2025, 00:30:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101aqmv$405r$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 5/29/25 11:12, The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
>
The Starmaker wrote:
>
The Starmaker wrote:
>
The Starmaker wrote:
>
LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>
Particle wave duality is no longer accepted as it has been
experimentally disproven.
>
The question regarding photons is still disputed.
>
"Did We Get the Double Slit Experiment All Wrong?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpMcC-E5l5c
>
Light is a wave and not a particle.
>
There is no "duality" of a wave and a particle, but it is a particle
wave.
>
Yous guys are too close to the ocean to sea the particle.
>
If you ask a fish
does the ocean waves
affect your in any way?
>
The fish wil be puzzled.
>
He'll say, "What ocean waves?, those are particles!"
>
You say to the fish "Don't you feel wet?"
>
He'll say "What's wet?"
>
When I go to the beach and jump into the ocean...
>
I can feel all those particles.
>
A fish doesn't breathe ocean waves...
>
a fish breathes ...particles.
>
A person doesn't breathe air waves..
>
a person breathes ...particles, air particles.
>
Is the fish wet?
>
The fish
swims
in the
same ocean
as you do.
>
Remove the gravity..
and you are swiming
  like a fish.
>
Are you wet?
>
What's wet?
 okay, i knows yous guys don't understand Real World Physics...
(especially since yous graduated from Google High or wiki university)
 The ocean
is Blue.
 Now, I'm not
talking about
that thing
you call
the wet
ocean blue...
(where all the fishes live)
 i'm talking about
the sky ocean blue.
  The sky is Blue.
 It begins
way up there..
and it ends way down there.
 Now, down there
would be where you are
standing on...
and way up there
would be around
70 miles.
  So, the sky ocean blue.
 (the sky is an ocean)
(and it is blue)
 means..
 you are living
at the bottom
of the ocean.
Yes the people of the world are insane meaning not true.
This is because they believe that images and sounds portrayed
by machines called television sets and radios are true.
It might be that something like 'chemistry' with 'orbitals'
and the like exists, but when they try to 'prove' it with
images and sounds from televisions and radios they fail
to understand how totally they have retreated into gibberish
for their supposed 'proofs'.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 May 25 * Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.110LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.58Paul.B.Andersen
27 May 25 i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.57LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Ross Finlayson
27 May 25 i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Leolin Baboshkin
29 May 25 i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.54Paul.B.Andersen
29 May 25 i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.47LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.46Paul.B.Andersen
30 May 25 i  i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Paul.B.Andersen
31 May 25 i  i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.43Maciej Woźniak
31 May 25 i  i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.42rhertz
31 May 25 i  i   +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.39LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jun 25 i  i   i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.38Paul.B.Andersen
1 Jun 25 i  i   i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Paul.B.Andersen
1 Jun 25 i  i   i i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Ross Finlayson
1 Jun 25 i  i   i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Maciej Woźniak
1 Jun 25 i  i   i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Jun 25 i  i   i i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.6Paul.B.Andersen
4 Jun 25 i  i   i i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5Maciej Woźniak
4 Jun 25 i  i   i i  +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Jhon Dobrenkov
16 Jun 25 i  i   i i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Jun 25 i  i   i i   `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jun 25 i  i   i i    `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Maciej Woźniak
2 Jun 25 i  i   i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.27Thomas Heger
2 Jun 25 i  i   i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.18Thomas Heger
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i+- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.10Athel Cornish-Bowden
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  ii+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.8Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7J. J. Lodder
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Elick Tulaev
5 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5Thomas Heger
5 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4J. J. Lodder
5 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii   +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Emory Batsanov
8 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii   `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
8 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii    `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Darin Patrianakos
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  ii`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.6Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5J. J. Lodder
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Python
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i  i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Raikhlin Balabanov
7 Jun 25 i  i   i  i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
7 Jun 25 i  i   i  i   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Osmani Babakhanov
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4Paul.B.Andersen
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i+- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bobauk Bakharev
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Paul.B.Andersen
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bertitaylor
31 May 25 i  i   +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 May 25 i  i   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Baldemar Pokhojaev
29 May 25 i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Paul.B.Andersen
30 May 25 i  i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i  +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i  `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7Ross Finlayson
27 May 25 i+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 ii`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4Ross Finlayson
29 May 25 ii `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 ii  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Ross Finlayson
30 May 25 ii   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.20Bertitaylor
27 May 25 i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.19LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 May 25 i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.18Bertitaylor
28 May 25 i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.17LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 May 25 i   `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.16Bertitaylor
28 May 25 i    `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.15LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 May 25 i     `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.14Bertitaylor
28 May 25 i      +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i      `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.12LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i       `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.11Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i        +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i        `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.9LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i         `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.8Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i          +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i          i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i          i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Bertitaylor
30 May 25 i          i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Jun 25 i          i   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1bertitaylor
29 May 25 i          `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Jun 25 i           `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bertietaylor
28 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.10Thomas Heger
28 May 25 i+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.8LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 ii`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7Thomas Heger
30 May 25 ii +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Felierix Babaev
31 May 25 ii +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4Thomas Heger
31 May 25 ii i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jun 25 ii i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
1 Jun 25 ii i  `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Jerrold Kalistratov
1 Jun 25 ii `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Kennon Babashov
28 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.12Mikko
28 May 25 i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.11LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7Mikko
29 May 25 i i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.6LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Ross Finlayson
30 May 25 `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1x

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal