Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
De : ttt_heg (at) *nospam* web.de (Thomas Heger)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 01. Jun 2025, 08:12:03
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ma2cmfFaqamU2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am Samstag000031, 31.05.2025 um 09:09 schrieb Maciej Woźniak:
...
>
The measurement of a quantity isn't that quantity, but a different thing.
>
You should regard measurements as human artifacts and totally irrelevant for nature.
 So are "quantities", unfortunately.
Actually I make the distinction between measurement and quantity.
So: we have, say, a stick of e.g. wood. This has a certain form, which we measure in -say- meters.
Now the real thing 'stick' has an attribute, which we call 'length' (or 'form' or whatever you like).
But this stick has this attribute without human intervention and whether we measure it or not.
The measure 'meters' however and the measuring device are human artifacts and belong into our own realm and would not exist without us.
Therefore the measurement is an artifact, while the quantity is a real attribute of something we measure.
The 'cut', however, between the stick of the example above and the tree it still belongs to, is an artifact again.

 
We can measure something, however, and did so since ancient times.
>
But the measurement belongs to us as human beings, while the things we measure belong to nature.
 Nope. "length", "time", "energy", anything -
are human developed abstracts.
 
If you say essentially the same, you should not write 'nope'.
TH

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 May 25 * [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.148Julio Di Egidio
24 May 25 +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
24 May 25 +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.114Ross Finlayson
24 May 25 i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.113Julio Di Egidio
24 May 25 i +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Otniel Abuhov
24 May 25 i +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.15Ross Finlayson
25 May 25 i i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.14Thomas Heger
25 May 25 i i +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25 i i i`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Thomas Heger
25 May 25 i i `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Ross Finlayson
25 May 25 i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.16Paul.B.Andersen
25 May 25 i  +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.14Maciej Woźniak
25 May 25 i  i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Delman Vamvakidis
25 May 25 i  i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Maciej Woźniak
25 May 25 i  i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Arden Vassilopulos
25 May 25 i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Walton Molnár
25 May 25 `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.132Julio Di Egidio
25 May 25  +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Bladimir Rudawski
26 May 25  `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.130Ross Finlayson
26 May 25   `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.129Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25    +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Ross Finlayson
26 May 25    i`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25    +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.18Julio Di Egidio
27 May17:44    i+* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Ross Finlayson
27 May23:35    ii`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
1 Jun13:41    i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.15Julio Di Egidio
1 Jun14:33    i +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Richard Hachel
1 Jun15:36    i i`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Carlis Bakurov
2 Jun07:27    i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Ross Finlayson
2 Jun14:36    i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25    `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.118Paul.B.Andersen
26 May 25     +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.17Python
26 May 25     i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.16Maciej Woźniak
26 May 25     i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.15Python
26 May 25     i  `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.14Maciej Woźniak
26 May 25     i   `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Python
27 May 25     i    `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Richard Hachel
27 May21:23     i     `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Ross Finlayson
30 May00:47     `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.110LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May13:19      +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.18Paul.B.Andersen
30 May13:51      i+- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Wilder Molostov
30 May18:12      i+* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Richard Hachel
30 May22:37      ii`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12J. J. Lodder
30 May23:39      ii `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Ezekiel Beklemishev
31 May07:56      i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Thomas Heger
1 Jun08:12      i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Thomas Heger
2 Jun16:50      i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Thomas Heger
1 Jun11:35      `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal