Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
De : julio (at) *nospam* diegidio.name (Julio Di Egidio)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 01. Jun 2025, 13:41:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101hhpv$1vuss$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 26/05/2025 16:34, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
On 26/05/2025 05:47, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
<snip>
Coherence conditions is my best bet, as opposed to
everything goes, as that immediately makes no sense:
ultimately in a quantum mechanical form (information),
but already geometrically because *zero* (proper)
distance along a light-like path I take for serious:
zero distance is direct contact, and even sameness...
 # A coherence law for retro-causation: the observer.
 The observer from the future...
"Decoherence as co-coherence."
Consider the (Minkowski) space-time structure (which
is a mapping of our Universe), and project it onto the
(isochronous) space of a/"our" proper present: here we
have *decoherence*, as a loss of quantum information,
and a "collapse" to classical probabilities.  Kind of
a *co-holographic* principle.
-Julio

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 May 25 * [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.148Julio Di Egidio
24 May 25 +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
24 May 25 +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.114Ross Finlayson
24 May 25 i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.113Julio Di Egidio
24 May 25 i +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Otniel Abuhov
24 May 25 i +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.15Ross Finlayson
25 May 25 i i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.14Thomas Heger
25 May 25 i i +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25 i i i`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Thomas Heger
25 May 25 i i `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Ross Finlayson
25 May 25 i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.16Paul.B.Andersen
25 May 25 i  +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.14Maciej Woźniak
25 May 25 i  i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Delman Vamvakidis
25 May 25 i  i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Maciej Woźniak
25 May 25 i  i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Arden Vassilopulos
25 May 25 i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Walton Molnár
25 May 25 `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.132Julio Di Egidio
25 May 25  +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Bladimir Rudawski
26 May 25  `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.130Ross Finlayson
26 May 25   `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.129Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25    +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Ross Finlayson
26 May 25    i`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25    +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.18Julio Di Egidio
27 May17:44    i+* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Ross Finlayson
27 May23:35    ii`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
1 Jun13:41    i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.15Julio Di Egidio
1 Jun14:33    i +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Richard Hachel
1 Jun15:36    i i`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Carlis Bakurov
2 Jun07:27    i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Ross Finlayson
2 Jun14:36    i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25    `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.118Paul.B.Andersen
26 May 25     +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.17Python
26 May 25     i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.16Maciej Woźniak
26 May 25     i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.15Python
26 May 25     i  `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.14Maciej Woźniak
26 May 25     i   `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Python
27 May 25     i    `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Richard Hachel
27 May21:23     i     `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Ross Finlayson
30 May00:47     `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.110LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May13:19      +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.18Paul.B.Andersen
30 May13:51      i+- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Wilder Molostov
30 May18:12      i+* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Richard Hachel
30 May22:37      ii`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12J. J. Lodder
30 May23:39      ii `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Ezekiel Beklemishev
31 May07:56      i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Thomas Heger
1 Jun08:12      i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Thomas Heger
2 Jun16:50      i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Thomas Heger
1 Jun11:35      `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal