Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1

On 06/01/2025 05:41 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 26/05/2025 16:34, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 26/05/2025 05:47, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

<snip>

Coherence conditions is my best bet, as opposed to
everything goes, as that immediately makes no sense:
ultimately in a quantum mechanical form (information),
but already geometrically because *zero* (proper)
distance along a light-like path I take for serious:
zero distance is direct contact, and even sameness...

>
# A coherence law for retro-causation: the observer.
>
The observer from the future...

>
"Decoherence as co-coherence."
>
Consider the (Minkowski) space-time structure (which
is a mapping of our Universe), and project it onto the
(isochronous) space of a/"our" proper present: here we
have *decoherence*, as a loss of quantum information,
and a "collapse" to classical probabilities.  Kind of
a *co-holographic* principle.
>
-Julio
>

How is it, "merely a linear continuum", these three
space dimensions and a ray of time?
The practice of super-string theory (where super-strings
are effectively twice as many times smaller than atoms
than physics' atoms are smaller than us) of making
"more dimensions" to book-keep "more infinitesimals"
has that nature does it in less.