Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1

Am Montag000002, 02.06.2025 um 08:27 schrieb Ross Finlayson:

On 06/01/2025 05:41 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 26/05/2025 16:34, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 26/05/2025 05:47, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

<snip>

Coherence conditions is my best bet, as opposed to
everything goes, as that immediately makes no sense:
ultimately in a quantum mechanical form (information),
but already geometrically because *zero* (proper)
distance along a light-like path I take for serious:
zero distance is direct contact, and even sameness...

>
# A coherence law for retro-causation: the observer.
>
The observer from the future...

>
"Decoherence as co-coherence."
>
Consider the (Minkowski) space-time structure (which
is a mapping of our Universe), and project it onto the
(isochronous) space of a/"our" proper present: here we
have *decoherence*, as a loss of quantum information,
and a "collapse" to classical probabilities.  Kind of
a *co-holographic* principle.
>
-Julio
>

 How is it, "merely a linear continuum", these three
space dimensions and a ray of time?

There ain't no 'ray of time'.
Time behaves like an imaginary axis, if the axes of space are real.
Now the axis of time can be rotated, what makes new axes real, hence new spaces emerge from nothing (seemingly) if you would do that (rotate the axis of time).
TH
...