Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
De : nospam (at) *nospam* de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 04. Jun 2025, 13:50:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : De Ster
Message-ID : <1rdeeq1.fvzdlhj0t72N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:

Am Dienstag000003, 03.06.2025 um 19:44 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:
 
I have actually (carefully!!) 'tested' that particular paper and
found,
that it is FULL of errors.
>
The number of errors (plus others issues like violation of formal
standards, missing references, bad language..) was so large (400+),
that
I personally think, that Einstein was wilfully mocking the audience.
>
The audience didn't think so.
Au contraire, it was an instant succes,
among those who mattered.
Prestigeous univerisities starten trying to get Einstein
to accept a professorship.
>
>
>
I have looked at that paper very carefully and wrote about 428 comments
about statements, which were in many cases wrong.
>
Ah, some insight into yourself.
 
Alas, probably not. Thomas Heger has never understood the way commas are
used in English and how it differs from how they are used in German. So
although he is saying (probably correctly) that most of his 428 comments
are wrong, he probably thinks he was saying that many of Einstein's
statements were wrong, which is just his fantasy.
 
 
I don't think, that most of my comments were wrong, but that some of
them could be wrong.
 
Sure: commas in English are used differently from their use in German
and I have to admit some errors in this realm.
 
But you certainly don't want to argue with my comma setting errors.

Why not? You have got nothing better on Einstein, so...

This would be simply unfair, because I'm writing in a second language.

You are capable of misunderstanding Einstein in his own language, so...

And I would see you writing in German (with correct spelling and
grammar, of course).
 
Although I have tended to think that he's not quite at the level of
LaurenceClarkCrossen or Maciej Wozniak as a crackpot, I am beginning to
think that he is.
 
All 'dissidents' are called 'nuts' or crackpots'.
 
This is common behavior here and elsewhere.

Of course not. We certainly recognise true 'dissidents' as such,
like Andrei Sakharov for example.
You cannot arrogate the title 'dissident' to yourself.

You must be seen as such by others,
who think you have something worthwhile to say.
To achieve that you need to say things that aren't nutty or crackpot.

FYI, you failed,

Jan



Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 May 25 * Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.110LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.58Paul.B.Andersen
27 May 25 i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.57LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Ross Finlayson
27 May 25 i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Leolin Baboshkin
29 May 25 i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.54Paul.B.Andersen
29 May 25 i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.47LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.46Paul.B.Andersen
30 May 25 i  i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Paul.B.Andersen
31 May 25 i  i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.43Maciej Woźniak
31 May 25 i  i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.42rhertz
31 May 25 i  i   +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.39LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jun 25 i  i   i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.38Paul.B.Andersen
1 Jun 25 i  i   i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Paul.B.Andersen
1 Jun 25 i  i   i i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Ross Finlayson
1 Jun 25 i  i   i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Maciej Woźniak
1 Jun 25 i  i   i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Jun 25 i  i   i i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.6Paul.B.Andersen
4 Jun 25 i  i   i i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5Maciej Woźniak
4 Jun 25 i  i   i i  +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Jhon Dobrenkov
16 Jun 25 i  i   i i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Jun 25 i  i   i i   `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jun 25 i  i   i i    `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Maciej Woźniak
2 Jun 25 i  i   i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.27Thomas Heger
2 Jun 25 i  i   i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.18Thomas Heger
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i+- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.10Athel Cornish-Bowden
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  ii+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.8Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7J. J. Lodder
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Elick Tulaev
5 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5Thomas Heger
5 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4J. J. Lodder
5 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii   +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Emory Batsanov
8 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii   `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
8 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii    `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Darin Patrianakos
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  ii`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.6Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5J. J. Lodder
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Python
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i  i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Raikhlin Balabanov
7 Jun 25 i  i   i  i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
7 Jun 25 i  i   i  i   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Osmani Babakhanov
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4Paul.B.Andersen
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i+- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bobauk Bakharev
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Paul.B.Andersen
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bertitaylor
31 May 25 i  i   +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 May 25 i  i   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Baldemar Pokhojaev
29 May 25 i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Paul.B.Andersen
30 May 25 i  i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i  +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i  `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7Ross Finlayson
27 May 25 i+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 ii`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4Ross Finlayson
29 May 25 ii `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 ii  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Ross Finlayson
30 May 25 ii   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.20Bertitaylor
27 May 25 i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.19LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 May 25 i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.18Bertitaylor
28 May 25 i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.17LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 May 25 i   `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.16Bertitaylor
28 May 25 i    `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.15LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 May 25 i     `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.14Bertitaylor
28 May 25 i      +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i      `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.12LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i       `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.11Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i        +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i        `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.9LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i         `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.8Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i          +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i          i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i          i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Bertitaylor
30 May 25 i          i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Jun 25 i          i   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1bertitaylor
29 May 25 i          `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Jun 25 i           `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bertietaylor
28 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.10Thomas Heger
28 May 25 i+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.8LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 ii`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7Thomas Heger
30 May 25 ii +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Felierix Babaev
31 May 25 ii +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4Thomas Heger
31 May 25 ii i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jun 25 ii i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
1 Jun 25 ii i  `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Jerrold Kalistratov
1 Jun 25 ii `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Kennon Babashov
28 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.12Mikko
28 May 25 i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.11LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7Mikko
29 May 25 i i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.6LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Ross Finlayson
30 May 25 `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1x

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal