Liste des Groupes | Revenir à sp relativity |
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:Yes, the relativists commenting have no clue about the retarding
>On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:>
>LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:>
>Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology>
>
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious
journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some
respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.
And you cannot be a peer unless you are a deep devotee of relativity,
quantum and thermodynamics. In short, an anti-Science entity.
>
Sad.
>
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
Bertietaylor
>
--
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.