Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.
De : julio (at) *nospam* diegidio.name (Julio Di Egidio)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 15. Jun 2025, 13:53:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102mfoc$p7mn$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 15/06/2025 14:36, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> wrote:
 
On 15/06/2025 12:36, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> wrote:
>
On 15/06/2025 09:25, J. J. Lodder wrote:
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 20:00:42 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>
"AI: "The Einstein Hoax: The Disastrous Intellectual War on Common
Sense" is a book by Tom Van Flandern that critiques Albert Einstein's
theories, particularly relativity."
>
It is published under the pen name H. E. Retic, as explained in the
About the Author section, where he describes Van Flandern's career.
Reading it I find that it certainly seems like it must be Van Flandern's
and it's copyright 1997.
>
Do you have verifiable evidence
for H. E. Retic being Tom van Flandern?
>
I wouldn't want to lose you (am I wrong?), but could you please
stop feeding the spammers?
>
The book: "The Einstein Hoax: The Disastrous Intellectual War on Common
Sense" by H. E. Retic obviously exists.
(you can order it on Amazon for example,
   but I won't spend real money on it)
>
So I would like to see the About the Author section,
to see if the claim that he is Van Flandern is justified.
>
One never knows, even LaurenceClarkCrossen may provide
some useful information, once in a while,
>
BTW, Van Flandern admitted later on that his anti-relativity claims
based on Voyager data didn't hold water.
There has been a lot of discussion on it in the other SPR,
when that group still had worthwhile content.
>
And who gives a damn??
 It would seen that you are a nobody who is not aware
of the status of Tom Van Flndern as a serious research scientist.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Van_Flandern>
Some of his unorthodox views turned out to be wrong,
in others he was right.
 
Meanwhile, the truth
is that *not even Einstein understood relativity* (I'll give the
man the benefit of the doubt, but not the epoch nor the system):
so I guess I shouldn't be expecting much from you either.
 See? You are just being silly.
Have your fun, knowing better than Einstein,
Knowing better than *you*.  First, learn to read...
*Plonk*
-Julio

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Jun 25 * Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.17LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Jun 25 `* Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.16LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Jun 25  +- Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25  +* Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.13Julio Di Egidio
15 Jun 25  i+* Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.2Julio Di Egidio
15 Jun 25  ii`- Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.1Julio Di Egidio
15 Jun 25  i+* Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.9LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25  ii`* Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.8J. J. Lodder
15 Jun 25  ii +* Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.2Maciej Woźniak
15 Jun 25  ii i`- Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25  ii `* Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.5LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Jun 25  ii  +- Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Jun 25  ii  +- Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Jun 25  ii  +- Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Jun 25  ii  `- Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25  i`- Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25  `- Re: Tom Van Flandern's book aninymously criticizing relativity while he was alive.1LaurenceClarkCrossen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal