Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
De : clzb93ynxj (at) *nospam* att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 16. Jun 2025, 22:43:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <751e174f35a0cd738e0298638d4c2e15@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 7:51:44 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 16.06.2025 00:46, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 18:24:11 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
Mass does not change with variations of gravity.
Inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass.
Therefore, mass does not change with velocity.
>
There is no 'mass-velo
>
city relation'.
(except as a figure of speech)
>
There is nothing to disprove.
>
Jan
So, you admit relativity reduces to verbiage.
>
What are you quibbling about?
>
According to SR, mass is invariant, which means that
it doesn't change with with velocity.
>
You are stating a triviality which nobody dispute,
so you have neither proved nor disproved anything.
>
(That mass is invariant doesn't mean that can't change.)
The mass m of a body is not constant.
It varies with the body's velocity, according to the equation:
    m = m0/ √ 1−v2/c2
where:
    v      is the magnitude of the velocity of the body
    c      is the speed of light in vacuum
    m0     is the rest mass of the body.
The value m is known as the relativistic mass of the body.
The factor 1/ √1−v2/c2 is known as the Lorentz factor.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jun 25 * The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven16LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 +* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven9J. J. Lodder
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven4LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jun 25 ii `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Jun 25 ii  `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jun 25 i`- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Jun 25 +* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Mikko
27 Jun 25 i`* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Jul10:44 i `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Mikko
19 Jun 25 `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Richard Hachel
20 Jun 25  `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2Mikko
20 Jun 25   `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Jonatan Babanov

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal