Re: The first postulate is a truism.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: The first postulate is a truism.
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 01. Jul 2025, 10:39:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <71ddbac51a61a23bc2621c56f0925832@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 15:31:17 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

On 2025-06-30 12:15:05 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
>
Am Sonntag000029, 29.06.2025 um 10:03 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:
On 2025-06-29 04:20:02 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
>
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 19:18 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:
On 2025-06-28 16:22:06 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
>
>
[ … ]
>
>
Well, that's what you think.
>
For me it seems, that Heaviside and Gibbs were 'con-artists' and wanted
to divert physics from true science.
...
>
I don't know enough about Heaviside to comment on what you say about
him (though my guess is that it's complete bollocks to rival the
complete bollocks that you write on other subjects). For Gibbs,
however, it's clear that you don't know the first thing about Gibbs's
character. A good place to start would be the Wikiparticle on Gibbs,
but there is plenty to be learned from other sources.
>
>
My guess was, that Gibbs and Heaviside cooperated in the attempt to
eliminate quaternions.
>
Instead of guessing, why not try to find out?
>
Conspiracies are necessarily a secret.
>
So you cannot evaluate your guesses that easily.
>
But in my case I was also hindered by 'late birth'.
...
>
My guess is that "Thomas Heger" is a made-up name for someone working
for Vladimir Putin to gather information about people posting to this
group. My evidence for this? None whatsoever, but what does that matter?
The esteemed nose of Athel, Lord Bow-Wow Chappie we hold in the highest
esteem for its discerning quality.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor
>
>
--

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Jun 25 * The first postulate is a truism.55LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Jun 25 +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.53Mikko
20 Jun 25 i+* Re: The first postulate is a truism.33LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.32Mikko
21 Jun 25 ii +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.9LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25 ii i+* Re: The first postulate is a truism.5Python
22 Jun 25 ii ii+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Bertitaylor
22 Jun 25 ii ii+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Maciej Woźniak
23 Jun 25 ii ii`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 25 ii ii `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Python
22 Jun 25 ii i`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.3Mikko
23 Jun 25 ii i `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25 ii i  `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
22 Jun 25 ii +- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Jerald Warszawski
22 Jun 25 ii +- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Walid Paradjanov
23 Jun 25 ii +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 25 ii i+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
23 Jun 25 ii i`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25 ii i `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
23 Jun 25 ii `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.16LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25 ii  +- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
27 Jun 25 ii  `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.14Thomas Heger
27 Jun 25 ii   `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.13Mikko
28 Jun 25 ii    `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.12Thomas Heger
28 Jun 25 ii     +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.10Athel Cornish-Bowden
29 Jun 25 ii     i+* Re: The first postulate is a truism.8Thomas Heger
29 Jun 25 ii     ii`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.7Athel Cornish-Bowden
30 Jun 25 ii     ii `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.6Thomas Heger
30 Jun 25 ii     ii  `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.5Athel Cornish-Bowden
30 Jun 25 ii     ii   +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2Julio Di Egidio
30 Jun 25 ii     ii   i`- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Python
1 Jul 25 ii     ii   +- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Thomas Heger
1 Jul 25 ii     ii   `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25 ii     i`- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25 ii     `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
20 Jun 25 i+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25 i+* Re: The first postulate is a truism.6LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.5Mikko
21 Jun 25 ii +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 25 ii i`- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
23 Jun 25 ii `* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25 ii  `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
23 Jun 25 i+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 25 i+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 25 i+- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 25 i+* Re: The first postulate is a truism.3Mikko
23 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25 ii `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
23 Jun 25 i`* Re: The first postulate is a truism.6LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 25 i +- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Mikko
24 Jun 25 i +- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Jefforey Yoshimatsu
24 Jun 25 i +* Re: The first postulate is a truism.2Julio Di Egidio
24 Jun 25 i i`- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Otte Baigushev
24 Jun 25 i `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Maciej Woźniak
20 Jun 25 `- Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal