Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On 7/2/2025 7:20 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 01.07.2025 01:52, skrev Bertitaylor:

On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 18:18:47 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>

Elements with 1 proton in the nucleus are Hydrogen
There are two stable isotopes:
 ¹H (Protium)     1 proton 0 neutrons
 ²H (D Deuterium) 1 proton 1 neutron
>
 ³H (T Tritium) 1 proton 2 neutrons
  Tritium is unstable with half-life 12.33 years.
  The decay mode is β−, which means that a neutron splits
  into a proton and an electron. The electron is ejected as β-rays.
  So we get a nucleus with 2 protons and and 1 neutron, which is
  ³He, the most abundant stable Helium isotope.
>
  The short half-life should indicate that T should not
  exist naturally, but it is created by interaction between
  cosmic rays and air. The natural abundance is however very low.
>
But T can be artificially created in an atomic reactor.
T has several applications, among them are H-bombs.
>
D and T combine very easily in fusion to ⁴He, a stable Helium isotope.
That's why the Hydrogen in a H-bomb is enriched with both D and T.
(Some, or all of the T can be created in the bombs itself from lithium.)
>
An atomic bomb exploded on Earth can't create the temperature and
pressure to make H explode in a chain reaction. The enrichment
of D and T are necessary to make the bomb explode.
>
Please answer my question:
>
Do you really think that Teller & al, would have succeeded
in making the H-bomb if they didn't know what I stated above
(and _much_ more)?

 So the answer is "yes",

So there is no answer and you're fabricating,
as expected from a lying piece of shit you are.
But please answer my question.
Do you really believe that a measurement
doesn't have to give the real value of
the measured property to be a valid measurement?