Sujet : Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 02. Jul 2025, 19:34:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1043u2v$3keh3$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 01.07.2025 03:42, skrev Bertitaylor:
As natural radioactivity is caused when electrons
escape the nucleus the nucleus has to have electrons in it.
As natural radioactivity is caused when positrons
escape the nucleus the nucleus has to have positrons in it.
Are both statements true, or are both statements false?
Why cannot apes grasp this simple matter?
You mean this simple matter?
Example of β− decay: (electrons escape the nucleus)
---------------------------------------------------
Carbon-14 with 6 protons and 8 neutrons decays into
Nitrogen-14 with 7 protons and 7 neutrons + electron and antineutrino
Nitrogen-14 is stable
Example of β+ decay: (positrons escape the nucleus)
---------------------------------------------------
Carbon-10 with 6 protons and 4 neutrons decays into
Boron-10 with 5 protons and 5 neutrons + positron and neutrino
Boron-10 is stable
Are there electrons in the C14 nucleus and positrons in the B14 nucleus,
or no electrons in the C14 nucleus and no positrons in the B14 nucleus?
What does the apes say?
-- Paulhttps://paulba.no/
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)