Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 03. Jul 2025, 09:43:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1045fqe$32jl$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 03.07.2025 02:13, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 17:20:24 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 
Den 01.07.2025 01:52, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 18:18:47 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
Elements with 1 proton in the nucleus are Hydrogen
There are two stable isotopes:
 ¹H (Protium)     1 proton 0 neutrons
 ²H (D Deuterium) 1 proton 1 neutron
>
 ³H (T Tritium) 1 proton 2 neutrons
  Tritium is unstable with half-life 12.33 years.
  The decay mode is β−, which means that a neutron splits
  into a proton and an electron. The electron is ejected as β-rays.
  So we get a nucleus with 2 protons and and 1 neutron, which is
  ³He, the most abundant stable Helium isotope.
>
  The short half-life should indicate that T should not
  exist naturally, but it is created by interaction between
  cosmic rays and air. The natural abundance is however very low.
>
But T can be artificially created in an atomic reactor.
T has several applications, among them are H-bombs.
>
D and T combine very easily in fusion to ⁴He, a stable Helium isotope.
That's why the Hydrogen in a H-bomb is enriched with both D and T.
(Some, or all of the T can be created in the bombs itself from lithium.)
>
An atomic bomb exploded on Earth can't create the temperature and
pressure to make H explode in a chain reaction. The enrichment
of D and T are necessary to make the bomb explode.
>
Please answer my question:
>
Do you really think that Teller & al, would have succeeded
in making the H-bomb if they didn't know what I stated above
(and _much_ more)?
>
So the answer is "yes", Bertitaylor does indeed believe that
Teller & al would have succeeded in making the H-bomb even if
they had known nothing about Hydrogen, Deuterium and Tritium.
 They had to know that deuterium existed and tritium is irrelevant save
for confusion.

>
However, since they _did_ know what I have stated above, and much more,
about Hydrogen, Deuterium and Tritium they used a fission bomb around
a capsule with Deuterium and Tritium, and when the fission bomb went
off the pressure and temperature became so high that Deuterium and
Tritium was fused together in the fusion process:
    ²H+³H → ⁴He + n
Fact:
The H-bomb built in 1951 was based on this fusion process.

 Rubbish. The fission bomb caused the two protons in the deuterium
nucleus to split with the breaking of the electron bond holding them
together.
 Just consider two huge metal balls being held together by a string.
Electric charge is put on both so both balls must move apart. The string
stops them. Now the protons are like the two balls and the string is the
electron. Quite stable till the string is cut. Then the two balls go off
in different directions.
 The fission bomb creates the forces required to bust the electron bond.
 Pretty simple, what.
.. and quite funny.
One can but wonder how your mind works.
The first H-bomb was exploded 1951. Now its basic principles
are well known, it is fusion of D and T boosted by a fission bomb.
And you insist that it is is built and works according to
your fantasy invented 70 year later ? :-D
The fact that you don't understand how ridiculous it is says a lot
about your sanity.

>
D with 1 proton, 1 neutron + T with 1 proton, 2 proton 2 neutrons →
He with 2 protons, 2 neutrons + neutron + 17.6 MeV.
Most of the energy is kinetic energy of the ejected neutron.
>
D =  2.01410200 u
T =  3.01604928 u
------------------
      5.03015128 u
>
He = 4.002603254 U
n  = 1.008664916 U
------------------
      5.011268170
>
mass loss m = 0.01888310 u, E = mc²  = 17.589507 MeV

 Bullshit stuff made up to confuse people and boost the e=mcc nonsenses.

>
They simply put heavy water around a fission bomb to split deuterium and
thus made what is called a hydrogen bomb, with protons snapping off with
incredible force and thus causing a chain reaction with objects hitting
each other and creating huge energies as per the creation of energy
formula by divine Arindam that he discovered in 1998.
 Yes, yes.
>
Bertitaylor, I will not ask you if you really believe that Teller & al
could simply have put heavy water around a fission bomb to make a
H-bomb. Of course you don't. And you know they didn't.
>
Why do you pretend to believe what you know never happened?
 Exposing liars and lies leads to a safer and better world, so our
altruistic efforts. You are the victim of lies.
How can pretending that you believe what you know never happen
expose liars?

 
Are you trolling?
 No, following Jesus Christ for we did live in a Christian country. Now
talking pure Christianity does sound like trolling in this selfish world
of lies, run by greedy liars.
I see.
The whole thing is your interpretation of the Bible.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Jun 25 * Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)40Jim Pennino
26 Jun 25 `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)39bertitaylor
26 Jun 25  +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
26 Jun 25  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)37Paul.B.Andersen
26 Jun 25   +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Lon Mahankov
27 Jun 25   +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)34Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   i+* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)16Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)14Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)13Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   ii  +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)7Chris M. Thomasson
28 Jun 25   ii  i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)6Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25   ii  i `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)5Chris M. Thomasson
29 Jun 25   ii  i  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)4Bertitaylor
29 Jun 25   ii  i   `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Jun 25   ii  i    `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
4 Jul23:19   ii  i     `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jun 25   ii  +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
27 Jun 25   ii  i`- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   ii  `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Jim Pennino
28 Jun 25   ii   `* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
28 Jun 25   ii    `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   i+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 25   i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)16Paul.B.Andersen
27 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Dekota Hamaev
29 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
29 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Martino Krakowski
29 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
30 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Bertitaylor
30 Jun 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Kerwin Baklanov
1 Jul 25   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25   i +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Jim Pennino
1 Jul 25   i i`* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)2Bertitaylor
1 Jul 25   i i `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Jim Pennino
2 Jul18:20   i +* Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Jul18:46   i i+- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Maciej Woźniak
3 Jul09:43   i i`- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Paul.B.Andersen
2 Jul19:34   i +- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Paul.B.Andersen
4 Jul23:00   i `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Truman Agamov
3 Jul15:06   `- Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal