Sujet : Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy
De : jp (at) *nospam* python.invalid (Python)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 03. Jul 2025, 23:53:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <zlzFOlTdx-TjiWW3NnXp-kSuiks@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 03/07/2025 à 23:41, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 7/3/2025 9:54 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 03/07/2025 à 12:49, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
> ..
>> Samely as the clocks of the real world
>> are [...] keeping
>> indicating t'=t.
>
> There are two clocks near my place, one kilometer appart at two train stations.
>
> What you mean by t is shown by one of these clocks, and t' by other one, right?
>
> How could I check if t = t' ?
Using your brain. Thinking. You're a
true idiot so the method may easily
fail; most people manage, however.
Would you ? How ? How would *you* pick the value t (amongst many) and t' (amongst many) to compare ?
No it is not an engineering problem.
You're not expecting anyone to solve
an engineering problem with no
specification and without even seeing
the place.
What other "specification" about both clocks would you need? Just ask, I'll provide the specifics. Could you then answer my question?