Re: Relativism Killer

On 7/11/2025 1:02 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 11.07.2025 08:06, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

"Relativism Killer: The Collapse of Conceptual Relativity at the
Speed Limit"
Rub´en Yruretagoyena Conde

 Why do you not give a link to the paper?
 https://vixra.org/pdf/2507.0037v1.pdf

"Abstract
This article introduces a conceptual function named relativism killer(),
which demonstrates how the framework of relativity ceases to hold
coherence once a fundamental maximum is defined. We explore the
paradoxical boundary where relativistic logic collapses under its own
limit: the speed of light. At this precise threshold, the relative
becomes absolute, and the structure of reference frames disintegrates.
We introduce the concept of an ontological observer the definitional
entity, which reveals why the condition x = 1 terminates relativity.
This argument serves both as a philosophical reflection and as a
structural clarification of Einstein’s prediction, stripped of
assumptions and exposed as a necessary geometrical condition. It also
supports post relativistic models such as the Hijolum´ınic Theory."

  Have you read the paper?
 Quote of the first statement in the Introduction:
"Relativity, as introduced by Einstein, is based on the notion
  that measurements of space and time are relative to the motion
  of observers."
 Do I have to explain why this is nonsense?
I do? OK:
 A correct, but trivial statement would be:
"Physics is based on the notion that measurements of space
  and time are relative to the observer."

And speaking of measurements, poor trash:
if a measurement of a property of an observed
object gives a result different than the real
value of the property, the measurement is
a)valid
b)erroneous
c)UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which of the above is the correct ansswer
taught by your idiotic religion?