Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics
Suivi-à : sci.physics
Date : 14. Jul 2025, 03:02:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <d35ekl-dkgi1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-143-lowlatency (x86_64))
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2025 23:45:25 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
 
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 22:19:05 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
>
<snip old stuff>
>
        Arindam dismisses cloud chamber evidence —
>
It has nothing to do with Nature. Just an artificial construct at best.
So yes, that evidence is irrelevant. Nothing as relevant as Arindam's
rail gun experiments showing inertia violation.
>
You mean your low speed pipe roller that you are so proud of that you
have never written it up as text Arindam?
 
Arindam has done much better than that. He had provided crystal clear
video evidence with full explanations. That is a new way of providing
scientific truth. It is understandable to everyone. Schoolchildren in
particular with uncorrupted minds.

Youtube videos of your feet do not constitute documentation Arindam.

 
As it is incontrovertible it has to be ignored or demeaned by the vested
interests.
 
WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof-woof
 
Bertietaylor
>
Unlike your low speed pipe roller, it has been trivial to find detailed
instructions on how to build one since it's invention in 1911.
 
Can one make it for $1000 which is the equipment cost of Arindam's
apparatus? Can one make it work in one's garage or living room?

Yes and if you payed $1,000 for that pipe roller you got ripped off big
time Arindam.

Scientific American in The Amateur Scientist column of April 1956
published the plans for a DIY cloud chamber.

Most of the parts were junkyard bits and pieces and cost next to nothing
to procure even in 1956 dollars Arindam.

They also published articles in that time frame on how to build DIY
particle accelerators, xray machines, finishing vacuum pumps and many
other pieces of real scientific equipment.

CERN published a manual for a DIY cloud chamber in 2016 that would cost
well under $100 to build.

https://indico.cern.ch/event/508578/contributions/2327916/attachments/1367925/2073120/SCoolLAB_CloudChamber_DIYManual_2016_v2.pdf

There are LOTS of plans out there for DIY cloud chambers that would cost
well under $100 to build.

There is a kit to build a cloud chamber on ebay for $29.99.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/115162907606?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-117182-37290-0&mkcid=2&mkscid=101&itemid=115162907606&targetid=2295557531950&device=c&mktype=pla&googleloc=1014089&poi=&campaignid=21400677539&mkgroupid=173029508628&rlsatarget=pla-2295557531950&abcId=9448483&merchantid=6296724&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=21400677539&gclid=Cj0KCQjwss3DBhC3ARIsALdgYxOrerHJCaWCpLRPd-BnZ0VOT-Xngc1doWJ2hhrglluLyRP0OtTzmKwaAigREALw_wcB

You can buy one fully built on Amazon for $387.73.

https://www.amazon.com/Arbor-Scientific-Ionizing-Radiation-Specially/dp/B0DY23HNMH/ref=sr_1_3?crid=2N09Y99X6CPEH&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.XB2Vsz00dEbn62QueM_CnnDdTZwUMPHfdSx0xOHKNiE.eSv-1U8f9MomInZE71KTSf2p2lcmSa_1NpzEByOW9uQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=cloud+chamber&qid=1752458169&s=toys-and-games&sprefix=cloud+chamber%2Ctoys-and-games%2C207&sr=1-3

--
penninojim@yahoo.com

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jul 25 * Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics26Aether Regained
4 Jul 25 `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics25Bertitaylor
4 Jul 25  +* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics8Jim Pennino
14 Jul 25  i`* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics7Bertitaylor
14 Jul 25  i `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics6Jim Pennino
14 Jul 25  i  `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics5Bertitaylor
14 Jul 25  i   +* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics3Jim Pennino
14 Jul 25  i   i`* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics2Bertitaylor
14 Jul 25  i   i `- Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics1Jim Pennino
14 Jul 25  i   `- Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics1Paul.B.Andersen
5 Jul 25  +* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics9Aether Regained
5 Jul 25  i+* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics3Aether Regained
6 Jul 25  ii`* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics2Antony Paraskos
8 Jul 25  ii `- Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics1Thomas Heger
11 Jul 25  i`* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics5Bertitaylor
11 Jul 25  i `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics4Jim Pennino
12 Jul 25  i  `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics3Bertitaylor
13 Jul 25  i   `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics2Jim Pennino
13 Jul 25  i    `- Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics1Bertitaylor
9 Jul 25  `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics7Paul.B.Andersen
12 Jul 25   `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics6Bertitaylor
12 Jul 25    `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics5Paul.B.Andersen
12 Jul 25     `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics4Bertitaylor
13 Jul 25      `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics3Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 25       `* Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics2Bertitaylor
14 Jul 25        `- Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics1Paul.B.Andersen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal