Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions

Liste des Groupes 
Sujet : Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions
De : no.email (at) *nospam* nospam.invalid (Paul Rubin)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 07. Jun 2025, 20:58:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <87plff4938.fsf@nightsong.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> writes:
For (.) (D.) (U.) that's certainly not the case in Gforth.
I said the Standard hadn't factored them out.  Several forths of course
have factored them out.

Well I think you were saying the standard SHOULD have factored them out,
presumably because they are both useful to users, and reasonably
necessary parts of the underlying implementation that could have been
exported, as opposed to just giving more clutter for implementers to
supply.

So now I have to also wonder what they do and what they are good for. 

As for /CHAR >CHAR >DIGIT HELD MU* MU/MOD TRIM UNNEST

Same for these.  I can sort of guess at a few.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 May 25 * THROW codes and ambiguous conditions39dxf
31 May 25 +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions7Anton Ertl
31 May 25 i+* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
3 Jun21:48 ii`- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1sjack
31 May 25 i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions4Anton Ertl
1 Jun 25 i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions3albert
1 Jun 25 i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2Anton Ertl
1 Jun 25 i   `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1albert
1 Jun 25 `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions31Hans Bezemer
2 Jun 25  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
2 Jun 25  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions29albert
3 Jun 25   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions28dxf
3 Jun 25    +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions24Anton Ertl
4 Jun15:44    i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions23dxf
4 Jun20:25    i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions22sean
5 Jun07:09    i  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
5 Jun11:17    i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions20albert
6 Jun01:47    i   +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
6 Jun07:15    i   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions18sean
6 Jun12:00    i    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions17albert
6 Jun22:06    i     `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions16sean
7 Jun04:10    i      `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions15dxf
7 Jun05:26    i       `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions14sean
7 Jun05:42    i        +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
7 Jun10:43    i        +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions11Anton Ertl
7 Jun15:06    i        i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions10dxf
7 Jun20:58    i        i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions9Paul Rubin
8 Jun02:49    i        i  +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions3Paul Rubin
8 Jun04:36    i        i  i+- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
8 Jun09:07    i        i  i`- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1Anton Ertl
8 Jun03:16    i        i  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
8 Jun08:56    i        i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions4Anton Ertl
8 Jun15:45    i        i   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions3dxf
9 Jun12:36    i        i    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
9 Jun13:24    i        i     `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1LIT
7 Jun15:41    i        `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1LIT
3 Jun 25    +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1John
4 Jun03:03    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
6 Jun11:47     `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1Hans Bezemer

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal