Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 06. Feb 2025, 17:55:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vo2pit$31hlr$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 06.02.2025 15:57, Jim Burns wrote:
On 2/6/2025 3:54 AM, WM wrote:
The axiom of induction:
∀P:ℕ₁→{⊤,⊥}:
That appears like nonsense. I prefer Wikipedia:
∀P( P(1) /\ ∀k(P(k) ==> P(k+1)) ==> ∀n (P(n)).
The key is that ∀ᴺ¹n: ∃ᴺ¹j′: n<j′
The key is that the set ℕ is created by induction.
If the set M is described as the smallest set satisfying
1 ∈ M and n ∈ M ==> n+1 ∈ M
then ℕ\M = Ø.
There is nothing remaining.
By the axiom of induction
the result is the empty set.
You (WM) agree that ∀ᴺ¹n: ∃ᴺ¹j′: n<j′
No. I agree to what I wrote.
Regards, WM