Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 08. Feb 2025, 22:54:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vo8jr7$7mh2$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 08.02.2025 18:43, Jim Burns wrote:
Do you use ω-1 ?
Not in this proof.:
The axiom of induction says: If any property or predicate P satifies
(P(1) /\ ∀k(P(k) ==> P(k+1)), then it describes all elements of an inductive = infinite set. That is satisfied by the set M of all FISONs which are useless in U(A(n)) = ℕ.
Therefore U(A(n)) = ℕ ==> U{ } = { } = ℕ. This is false. By contraposition we get ~{ } = ℕ ==> ~ U(A(n)) = ℕ.
Regards, WM