Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a philosophy 
Sujet : Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory comp.ai.philosophy sci.logic
Date : 07. Jun 2025, 23:59:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <996d2679993ffba4c044c9f16270b03eb5117a3b@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/7/25 10:54 AM, olcott wrote:
On 6/7/2025 9:51 AM, dbush wrote:
On 6/7/2025 10:32 AM, olcott wrote:
The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
of DDD emulated by HHH from DDD emulated by HHH1.
>
int main()
{
   HHH1(DDD);
}
>
Shows that DDD emulated by HHH and DDD emulated by
HHH1 diverges as soon as HHH begins emulating itself
emulating DDD.
>
*From the execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shown below*
DDD emulated by HHH1              DDD emulated by HHH
[00002183] push ebp               [00002183] push ebp
[00002184] mov ebp,esp            [00002184] mov ebp,esp
[00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD    [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD
[0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH    [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH
*HHH1 emulates DDD once then HHH emulates DDD once, these match*
>
The next instruction of DDD that HHH emulates is at
the machine address of 00002183.
>
The next instruction of DDD that HHH1 emulates is at
the machine address of 00002190.
>
False.
>
The next instruction of DDD that both HHH and HHH1 emulates is at the machine address of 000015c3,
 *That is not an instruction of DDD*
Sure it is, of the PROGRAM DDD.
And if it isn't there, then NO PROGRAM can emulate the call HHH instruction.
Your problem is you defined yourself out of being in the problem you need to be in, and thus all you work is just a great big lie based on a category error at the start.
I guss you are just PROVING to the world that you last decades have been spent chasing LIES that you made to yourself, and to every one else, and that NOTHGING you have said can be considered to have any factual basis, as you have admitted that you don't use the term-of-art meanings. and thus any claim to be talking in a field is just a LIE.

*That is not an instruction of DDD*
*That is not an instruction of DDD*
*That is not an instruction of DDD*
 _DDD()
[00002183] 55             push ebp
[00002184] 8bec           mov ebp,esp
[00002186] 6883210000     push 00002183 ; push DDD
[0000218b] e833f4ffff     call 000015c3 ; call HHH
[00002190] 83c404         add esp,+04
[00002193] 5d             pop ebp
[00002194] c3             ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002194]
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Jun15:32 * The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence25olcott
7 Jun15:51 +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence10dbush
7 Jun15:54 i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence9olcott
7 Jun15:56 i +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence7dbush
7 Jun15:58 i i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence6olcott
7 Jun16:01 i i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence5dbush
7 Jun16:06 i i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4olcott
7 Jun16:08 i i   +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2dbush
7 Jun16:12 i i   i`- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1olcott
8 Jun00:07 i i   `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
7 Jun23:59 i `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
7 Jun23:56 +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4Richard Damon
8 Jun12:08 i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence3Richard Damon
8 Jun18:24 i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2Richard Damon
9 Jun03:36 i  `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
8 Jun18:22 +- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Fred. Zwarts
11 Jun22:06 `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence9anthk
12 Jun01:03  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence8olcott
12 Jun02:29   `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence7Richard Damon
12 Jun05:44    +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4olcott
12 Jun10:42    i+* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2Fred. Zwarts
12 Jun16:13    ii`- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS1olcott
12 Jun15:21    i`- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
12 Jun16:03    `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS2olcott
12 Jun23:57     `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS1Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal