Sujet : Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.logic comp.theoryDate : 08. Jul 2024, 03:54:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <8bd5f2159853ff17ef81b27a85141bccc324e7d9@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/7/24 10:52 PM, olcott wrote:
On 7/7/2024 9:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/7/24 10:22 PM, olcott wrote:
On 7/7/2024 1:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>
Is "Not-a-logic-sentence" a truth value that True, of ~false can return or not?
>
>
*I will try to be perfectly clear*
Not-a-logic-sentence(L,x) ≡ (~True(L,x) ∧ ~True(L,~x))
>
>
In other words, you have no idea of how to express you concept in the terms of how a logic would be built with it, as you just don't undertand how logic works.
>
That every expression of language that is {true on the basis of
its meaning expressed using language} must have a connection by
truth preserving operations to its {meaning expressed using language}
is a tautology. The accurate model of the actual world is expressed
using formal language and formalized natural language.
Word salad.
No such model exists, so you are basing your system on faery dust.
You just don't understand what you are talking about, and think Formal Logic is just like the abstract philosophy you seemed to have studied a bit of.
…