Sujet : Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 03. Jul 2024, 15:11:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <d593179ccad2eef1e84ab6eeddb0f255b2b386e5@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 22:55:12 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/2/2024 10:50 PM, joes wrote:
Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:46:38 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/2/2024 2:17 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 02.jul.2024 om 21:00 schreef olcott:
On 7/2/2024 1:42 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 02.jul.2024 om 14:22 schreef olcott:
On 7/2/2024 3:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 02.jul.2024 om 03:25 schreef olcott:
HHH repeats the process twice and aborts too soon.
>
DDD is correctly emulated by any HHH that can exist which calls this
emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted (which may be
never).
Whatever HHH does, it does not run forever but aborts.
HHH halts on input DDD.
DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly halt.
WTF? It only calls HHH, which you just said halts.
-- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:Objectively I am a genius.
…