Sujet : Re: True on the basis of meaning --- Good job Richard ! ---Socratic method
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : sci.logic comp.theoryDate : 15. May 2024, 06:11:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v21cl1$lt0s$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/13/2024 9:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/13/24 10:03 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/13/2024 7:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>
Remember, p defined as ~True(L, p) is BY DEFINITION a truth bearer, as True must return a Truth Value for all inputs, and ~ a truth valus is always the other truth value.
>
>
Can a sequence of true preserving operations applied to expressions
that are stipulated to be true derive p?
No, so True(L, p) is false
and thus ~True(L, p) is true.
>
Can a sequence of true preserving operations applied to expressions
that are stipulated to be true derive ~p?
No, so False(L, p) is false,
*PLEASE STUDY THIS VERY CAREFULLY SO WE DON'T HAVE TO KEEP*
*GOING OVER THE EXACT SAME POINT MY SHOULDER IS HURTING*
On 5/14/2024 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> So, what result SHOULD True(L, x) return? when x is
> the expression ~True(L, x)
>
*YOU ALREADY AGREED THAT*
On 5/13/2024 9:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> No, so True(L, p) is false
*WHEN*
>> On 5/13/2024 7:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> ... p defined as ~True(L, p) ...
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer