Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 07. Jun 2024, 19:22:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <v3vj4t$39ri6$6@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/7/24 1:14 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/7/2024 12:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/7/24 12:46 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/7/2024 11:25 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/7/24 11:56 AM, olcott wrote:
On 6/7/2024 10:46 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/7/24 11:29 AM, olcott wrote:
On 6/7/2024 10:14 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/7/24 9:09 AM, olcott wrote:
On 6/6/2024 10:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>
If the essence of your life's work is that you came up with a way to not-prove the thing you were trying to prove
>
No you are just a Liar
>
Then try to show it.
>
I conclusively prove my point and you finally admit that your whole
CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT strawman deception fake rebuttal has always simply
ignored the proof that I am correct shown below:
>
Try to show how this DD correctly simulated by any HH ever
stops running without having its simulation aborted by HH.
>
_DD()
[00001e12] 55         push ebp
[00001e13] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp
[00001e15] 51         push ecx
[00001e16] 8b4508     mov  eax,[ebp+08]
[00001e19] 50         push eax      ; push DD
[00001e1a] 8b4d08     mov  ecx,[ebp+08]
[00001e1d] 51         push ecx      ; push DD
[00001e1e] e85ff5ffff call 00001382 ; call HH
>
A {correct simulation} means that each instruction of the
above x86 machine language of DD is correctly simulated
by HH and simulated in the correct order.
>
Anyone claiming that HH should report on the behavior
of the directly executed DD(DD) is requiring a violation
of the above definition of correct simulation.
>
>
And your last statement proves why you have the problem.
>
>
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
   If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
   until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
   stop running unless aborted then
>
   H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D
   specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
</MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>
And for this, "Correct Simulation" means a simulation that accurated reflects that actual behavior of the dirrectly executed machine,
>
I provide conclusive proof otherwise and your "rebuttal" is
that you are unwilling to examine my proof, after three years
of misleading strawman deception fake "rebuttals".
>
No, you don't.
>
It seems
>
>
On 6/6/2024 9:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am
 > not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
 >
>
Try to show how this DD correctly simulated by any HH ever
stops running without having its simulation aborted by HH.
>
Why? I have shown that is a useless question for the problem.
>
 *I have proven it thousands of times in the last three years*
2,000 times would only be an average of less than two proofs
per day.
No, you haven't PROVEN it, but argued it must be true.
You don't seem to know what a formal proof actually is.
I don't care about your claim, because it is, by defintion, a dead end, as far as halting is concerned, as partial simulation do not show non-halting behavior by themselves.

 Richard has finally admitted that he never looked at
any of these proofs thus finally admitting that his
dishonest dodge CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT strawman deception
fake rebuttal was always dishonest and deceptive.
 
That is NOT what I have said, som you just prove yourself to be a LIAR.
I said I haven't put the effort to look into the factuality of your claim, which is just a claim since you haven't actually stated a proof,.
IF you want to claim a proof, I will ask for a listing of the accepted predicates that your proof uses as its starting point, and the listing of the truth perserving operation.
Having never posted such a thing, you have never "Proved" your statement in the formal system of computation theory.
Sorry Peter, but you have been debunked.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jun 24 * At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact210olcott
5 Jun 24 +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact206Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact205olcott
5 Jun 24 i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact204Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact203olcott
5 Jun 24 i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact202Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact201olcott
5 Jun 24 i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact196Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i     i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact195olcott
5 Jun 24 i     i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact194Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i     i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact193olcott
5 Jun 24 i     i   +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1joes
6 Jun 24 i     i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact191Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact190olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact189Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact188olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i       `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact187Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i        `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact186olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i         `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact185Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i          `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact184olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i           `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact183Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i            `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact182olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i             `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact181Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i              `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact180olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i               `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact179Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i                `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact178olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i                 `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact177Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i                  +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact170olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i                  i+- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1wij
6 Jun 24 i     i                  i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact168Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i                  i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact167olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact166Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard165olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard6olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard5Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard4olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i    `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard157Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard156olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard155Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard17olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  i+* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard13Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard12olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard11Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard10olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii   +* Re: Last communication with Richard2Rich Yard Daemon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii   i`- Re: Last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard7Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard6olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard5Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii      +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii      i`- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  ii       `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Fred. Zwarts
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  i  `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard137olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i   +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1immibis
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i   +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard134Alan Mackenzie
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard133olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard131Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard130olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard105wij
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i+* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard16immibis
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard15joes
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard14olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard13Mikko
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard12olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii    +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii    i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii    i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard8Mikko
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard7olcott
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard6Mikko
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii       `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard5olcott
10 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii        `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard4Mikko
10 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii         `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3olcott
11 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii          +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Mikko
12 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i ii          `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard88olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard24wij
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard23olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard22wij
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard21olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard17Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard16olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard12Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard11olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard9Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard8olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard6Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard5olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i i i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i i i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i i i i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i i i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard53Alan Mackenzie
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard9joes
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard7Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard17Mikko
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1joes
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1immibis
6 Jun 24 i     i                  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact6olcott
6 Jun 24 i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact4ornott
5 Jun 24 `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact3Fred. Zwarts

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal