Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2

On 6/14/24 11:53 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/14/2024 10:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/14/24 11:07 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/13/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > On 6/13/24 11:32 AM, olcott wrote:
 >>
 >> It is contingent upon you to show the exact steps of how H computes
 >> the mapping from the x86 machine language finite string input to
 >> H(D,D) using the finite string transformation rules specified by
 >> the semantics of the x86 programming language that reaches the
 >> behavior of the directly executed D(D)
 >>
 >
 > Why? I don't claim it can.
>
_D()
[00000cfc](01) 55          push ebp
[00000cfd](02) 8bec        mov ebp,esp
[00000cff](03) 8b4508      mov eax,[ebp+08]
[00000d02](01) 50          push eax       ; push D
[00000d03](03) 8b4d08      mov ecx,[ebp+08]
[00000d06](01) 51          push ecx       ; push D
[00000d07](05) e800feffff  call 00000b0c  ; call H
[00000d0c](03) 83c408      add esp,+08
[00000d0f](02) 85c0        test eax,eax
[00000d11](02) 7404        jz 00000d17
[00000d13](02) 33c0        xor eax,eax
[00000d15](02) eb05        jmp 00000d1c
[00000d17](05) b801000000  mov eax,00000001
[00000d1c](01) 5d          pop ebp
[00000d1d](01) c3          ret
Size in bytes:(0034) [00000d1d]
>
If there is no mapping from the input to H(D,D) to the behavior
of D(D) then H is not even being asked about the behavior of D(D).
H has no obligation to answer questions *THAT IT IS NOT BEING ASKED*
>

>
You keep on stating that LIE.
>

 That is is over-your-head does not even make it untrue.
That you call me a liar makes you a liar.

But it is the TURTH, it IS the MAPPING that H is REQURED to give if it is to be a correct Halt Decider.

If you want to claim that I am wrong YOU MUST USE REASONING.

Like, THE DEFINITION of a Halt Decider?

Calling me a liar makes you a liar and a fool.

Your saying something doesn't exsit that you have been shown, and not doing one thing to prove your point just demonstartes that you are nothing but a stupid liar that is stuck in his own brainwashing.

 

H, being a Halting Decider (or are you lying about that) has exactly one question it *IS* being asked about every input it s given, that that is "Will the execution of the program represented by your input Halt when run?"
>

 Yes you are very good at memorizing textbooks now prove that the
input to H(D,D) can be transformed into the question Does D(D) halt?
 >>  > Why? I don't claim it can.
 Then H is NOT BEING ASKED ABOUT THE BEHAVIOR OF D(D).
I chopped out the attempt to change the subject.
*YOU MUST STAY FOCUSED ON THIS POINT*
 

Then H is NOT a Halt Decider.
BY DEFINITION
PERIOD.
And you are PROVED to be a DAMNED LIAR.,