Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 6/24/2024 6:19 PM, Richard Damon wrote:What is the LIE?On 6/24/24 9:42 AM, olcott wrote:Since you are such a damned liar I am not going to giveOn 6/24/2024 6:02 AM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 6/23/24 11:26 PM, olcott wrote:>On 6/23/2024 10:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 6/23/24 10:52 PM, olcott wrote:>>>>
for the next 10,000 messages if you really want to look
foolish that long.
>
>
Go ahead, stall your argument till you die.
There is no sense moving on to the next point until AFTER
you quit lying about this point.
>
_P()
[000020e2] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[000020e3] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[000020e5] 51 push ecx ; housekeeping
[000020e6] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08] ; parameter
[000020e9] 50 push eax ; push parameter
[000020ea] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08] ; parameter
[000020ed] 51 push ecx ; push parameter
[000020ee] e82ff3ffff call 00001422 ; call H(P,P)
[000020f3] 83c408 add esp,+08
[000020f6] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax
[000020f9] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[000020fd] 7402 jz 00002101
[000020ff] ebfe jmp 000020ff
[00002101] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002104] 8be5 mov esp,ebp
[00002106] 5d pop ebp
[00002107] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0038) [00002107]
>
The call from P to H(P,P) when P is correctly emulated
by H cannot possibly return.
>
>
And my reply, like always, So?
>
you two different points to endlessly switch back and forth
between. I am going to keep repeating this point to prove
what a damned liar you really are.
void DDD()And what do we care about it?
{
H0(DDD);
}
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated
by H0 cannot possibly return.
Once we have closure on this point we can move on to
the last point.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.