Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure (typo)

On 6/24/2024 7:54 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/24/24 8:34 PM, olcott wrote:

>
I do correctly refute the halting problem proofs and
mandate mutual agreement on each step before I will
proceed to the next step.

 Nope, you never have because you never use the definition of HALTING, but insist you get to LIE about what halting is.
 You are just talking about your POOP.
 You are just to stupid to understand what you are talking about.
 

>
*I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
*I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
*I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
>
>

 Where?

*We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
*We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
*We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
D correctly simulated by H does not have the same behavior
as the directly executed D(D) because
the call from D to H(D,D) cannot possibly return when D
is correctly simulated by H.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer