Sujet : Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 02. Jul 2024, 02:32:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5vlb2$1b0k9$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/1/2024 7:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/1/24 8:49 AM, olcott wrote:
On 7/1/2024 6:08 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/30/24 10:27 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/30/2024 9:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/30/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/30/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/30/24 9:03 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 6/30/2024 7:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>
I had to dumb this down because even the smartest
people here were overwhelmed:
>
The call from DDD to HHH(DDD) when N steps of DDD are
correctly emulated by any pure function x86 emulator
HHH at machine address 0000217a cannot possibly return.
>
But that is NOT the "behavior of the input", and CAN NOT BE SO DEFINED.
>
>
I don't understand why you so stupidly lie about this.
>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>
DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an
emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted.
>
>
And, since the HHH that DDD calls will abort is emulation, it WILL return to DDD and it will return also.
>
>
How can stopping the emulation the first four
instructions of DDD possibly do anything besides stop?
>
>
The emulation stops, and the emulating behavor of HHH stops, but not the behavior of the input.
>
When DDD is no longer being emulated all of its behavior
stops. DDD is the input.
>
Nope, the emulation of DDD may stop, but the BEHAIVOR of THE INPUT, which isn't dependent on the emulator looking at it,
That is a stupid lie. In input is a static string when not
emulated and only becomes a dynamic process when emulated.
*Anyone with anything like a BSCS would know that*
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…