Re: Liar detector: Fred, Richard, Joes and Alan --- Ben's agreement

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Liar detector: Fred, Richard, Joes and Alan --- Ben's agreement
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 09. Jul 2024, 15:06:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6jg5j$1ctoi$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/9/2024 3:56 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 08.jul.2024 om 19:36 schreef olcott:
On 7/8/2024 11:16 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
You believe that two equals infinity.
>
void Infinite_Loop()
{
   HERE: goto HERE;
}
>
void Infinite_Recursion()
{
   Infinite_Recursion();
}
>
void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
}
>
Two cycles is enough to correctly determine that none
of the above functions correctly emulated by HHH can
possibly halt.
>
That you don't see this is ignorance or deception.
>
 The first two irrelevant examples cannot halt, but they differ fundamentally from DDD, because DDD, like Finite_Recursion, halts after N repetitions.
 
*I have never explained this issue to Ben this clearly before*
Ben seems to believe that HHH must report that it need not
abort the emulation of DDD because AFTER HHH has already
aborted this emulation DDD does not need to be aborted.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal